India votes against Srilanka in Geneva supports US Resolution

Reasons Why India Against Srilanka?

Srilanka is one of the nearest country So India given full support to them.

India given Millitery support and financial support as well. 

But Srilankans miss-used and they killed started Indians(who is citizens of srilanka). 

Srilanka get the weapons from India and they attacked Indians in Srilanka. 

So India GOT ANGRY.

Srilanka Killed more than 1 lakh Indians (who settled in srilanka)

So India Decided to vote against Srilanka.

Srilanka started attacking again Indian fisher mans.

There is a worst situation in India Srilanka border.

So India supports Srilankan Indians(who is in Srilanka).

India's Action Continues against Srilanka...

India waiting for a fair solution from United Nations.

India votes against Srilanka in Geneva supports US Resolution 2013

Indian Prime minister Manmonah Singh today (March 17) insinuated that India will vote against Sri Lanka at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) later this month.

Indian Finance Minister said - "I'm not the Prime Minister nor I am the External Affairs Minister. I'm confident that if phrases in the UN resolution sought credible independent international probe, India would support it," Indian Finance Minister said addressing a budget explanatory public meeting.

The minister also assured students who are preparing protest in Tamil Nadu tomorrow (March 18,) demanding affirmative action against Colombo at the UN session. "I'm feeding you my confidence and you feed this confidence to our students," Chidambaram said.

Indian Finance Minister made this statement after DMK, a constituent party to the government, threatened to pull out its ministers from the union cabinet if India did not amend the resolution to incorporate demand for international probe and time bound action against those who may be found guilty of war crimes.

India votes against Srilanka in Geneva supports US Resolution 2012

India voted for a United States-sponsored resolution - 2012 at the United Nations' top human rights body censuring Sri Lanka for its alleged rights violations during the war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

India initially showed reluctance to vote on a nation-specific resolution but changed its stand after political parties in Tamil Nadu exerted pressure on the United Progressive Alliance government to go with the resolution. The DMK, in particular, threatened to pull out its Ministers from the UPA government on the issue.  With 24 votes for, 15 against and 8 abstentions, the 47-member United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) adopted the resolution, which noted with concern that an internal inquiry report in Sri Lanka did not adequately address “serious allegations” of violations of international law.

The resolution asked Colombo to present expeditiously a comprehensive action plan detailing the steps to implement the recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) and to address the alleged violations of international law. Informed sources said India decided to vote after persuading the sponsor to make two changes in the draft so that it became “non-intrusive” and contributed to a political reconciliation process in the island nation.

India did not participate in the debate, but voted with countries like Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and Uruguay.  Many of India's neighbours, including China, Bangladesh and the Maldives; Russia, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia were among the countries that voted against the resolution, which asked Colombo to implement the LLRC's constructive recommendations.

Sri Lanka's Special Envoy on Human Rights Mahinda Samarasinghe rejected the resolution, saying it was “misconceived, unwarranted and ill-timed” embodying several “harmful” elements that violated important principles having adverse ramifications for his country and others. Warning that the resolution would be counter-productive, he said it would undermine the principle of non-interference in matters within the domestic jurisdiction of the country, a point backed by China and Russia.